Cheryl Kraemer  Module 3

Monsen, K., Handler, H., Le, S., & Riemer, J. (2014).  Feasability of using the Omaha System for self-report of symptoms by adults with diabetes.  Online Journal of Nursing Informatics 18(3).  Retrieved from: http://www.himss.org/ResourceLibrary/GenResourceDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=33518

Why was this article, blog, post, or multimedia chosen?

     I chose this article because it was in the latest copy of the Online Journal of Nursing Informatics.   While it primarily discusses patients using the Omaha System, it also discusses the possibility of implementing the Omaha System into personal health records as a communication tool between patients and healthcare providers.

What makes it interesting, appropriate, or reputable?

     This article was interesting because it was a study done by nursing students from the University of Minnesota and was conducted by the Center for Nursing Informatics.  It evaluated the usefulness of

Is it an opinion? Case study? Research study? Product review?

     As noted above, it was a research study.

What was the need, problem, issue or trend addressed in the article, blog, post, or multimedia?

     The study evaluated the usefulness of a standard terminology tool and its usefulness for adult diabetic patients.  The Omaha System is a standardized terminology for public health.  It consists of 3 components-the Problem Classification Scheme, the Intervention Scheme, and the Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes.  The Problem Classification Scheme was used for the study.  Thirty-one study participants reported 231 symptoms.  Forty-nine symptoms were identified by 20% or more of the respondents.  Ten symptoms were identified by at least 50% of respondents.  One symptom that was not a choice was excessive thirst.  It was recommended by study participants that it be included in the Omaha System.    

What was the solution for which technology had an answer?

     Having the Omaha System in personal health records would improve the patient provider relationship.   

What implications might this have in healthcare delivery?

     The ability to use this assessment tool on a global perspective and use the data on an international level to improve diabetes care has the potential to save millions of dollars as well as improve the health of people living with diabetes.

What did you learn from it that might have application for your practice?

   Using standardized terminology for patient self-report surveys has the potential to positively improve outcomes for patients who are affected by chronic diseases.